What are the Upcoming Trends to Impact Information Technology?

In the 21st century, Information Technology has gone beyond the use of raw data transmission, communications or computer systems. Lots of trends are emerging, which are helping businesses across the globe, and are expected to have a big impact on IT. These include:

Internet of Things (IOT)

The Internet of Things (IoT) includes devices which can connect with each other through the internet, and can exchange information. It came to focus in 1999, and in the last few years, has advanced a lot. The devices include actuators, electronics, applications, sensors, vehicles, home appliances and more. With the world being more in need of being connected globally today, the use of IoT can be expected more and more in Information Technology.

Machine Learning

This is among the sharpest tools in technology, which is used these days for making better predictions with the help of data and to take decisions much faster. In the domain of IT and science, there are lots of complex definitions of Machine learning. Machine Learning or ML makes proper use of data, and it can be useful for aiding in precise medical predictions, predicting possibilities or challenges, improving the accuracy of financial models and more.

Quantum Computing

In the domain of IT, this is another landmark innovation which is expected to shape the world of business in the years to come. It can help process a large amount of data in more than 5 million machines. According to research, Quantum Computing can be very useful for solving very complex technical issues and glitches. This trend can make human life much easier, and add more value to the world of business.

Practical Blockchain

Blockchain is getting more and more popular, as well as widespread in use, as it aids users in interacting with one another over the cyberspace without being supervised by any centralized authority or experiencing any risk of having to disclose any personal details. It is being used more and more for reducing transaction time, organizational expenses etc, and for ensuring more transparency, immutability and security. In the years to come, it can be expected to be used more and more in Information Technology to help end-users benefit from its optimal potential. In the global market, by the end of 2023, it can be expected to be used for ensuring total data security.

3D Printing

This technology has made it possible to create a 3D object directly from a digital file. It makes use of a PC to assimilate or solidify specific materials. 3D printing is being predicted to be entering disaster sites, homes and even outer spaces, in the long term.

Admission open at the best engineering colleges in Odisha.

Published by: 0

What are the Opportunities after a Diploma in Electronics and Communication Engineering?

Electronics engineering is a full-time, 3-year course that is among the most famous Diploma courses at the moment. It helps students get jobs in core areas like mobile technologies, wireless communications etc as well as in biomedical engineering, biotechnology and nanotechnology. Know about some of the career options and opportunities that are available after the completion of a diploma program in Electronics and Communication Engineering.

Private sector jobs

Once you complete this program, you can find many private sector opportunities, in case you have proper skills. When you hold Diploma in electronic engineering, you can get employment in different fields, such as electronics, IT, power, telecom, utilities, transport, automotive, construction industries, manufacturing etc. You can find work in famous private companies like TCS, TISCO, Wipro, Honeywell and LSI Logic, to name a few.

Government sector jobs

After the program completion, you can try to bag government jobs, as these come with social prestige, more remuneration, job security, stability in career and lots of other extra facilities. A few of the eminent government recruiters include SAIL, NTRO, NTPC, DRDO, DMRC, SSC, BSNL and Railway. However, there is huge competition, given that the number of seats available for electronic engineers is comparatively less than in other fields.

Computer courses

There are lots of opportunities in IT sector for people who hold a diploma in electronics engineering. When you also do a computer course, such as a CISCO Network Administration course, a Computer hardware course or a 6-month Programming language course, you can have a fantastic career. Doing such a course can raise chances of employ-ability for you, and make a big difference when you begin to look for a job.

Higher Studies

With a diploma program, it can be easier to have a broader perspective and be able to go for higher studies. You can do a post graduation, and go for further Ph.D. It can be easier for you to be a researcher and start working in Engineering Institute as a faculty member.

Job oriented professional courses

These are significant as well, and are extremely practical – as you can get a job directly after the course completion. With such courses, you can give your resume a boost and raise your chances of bagging the kind of job that you wish to have.

Open up your own business

Becoming self-employed is another option to consider, and while it can be challenging, you can be your own boss and have unlimited income potential.

Published by: 0

Books

Best college in Odisha

Repositioning Folklore and Indigenous Knowledge System

ISBN: 9788193172100

Edited by :Chandrabhanu Pattanayak

Associate Editors : Prajna Pani, Ajit Kumar Pradhan, Ambika Shankar Mishra

Publisher:- Centurion University Press (2016)

Centurion University of Technology and Management  At:Village Alluri Nagar P.O- R Sitapur, Via- Uppalada, Paralakhemundi, Dist: Gajapati-761200, Odisha,  India

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.cutm.ac.in

ISBN: 978-81-931721-0-0

This publication is a compilation of papers presented at the 36th Indian Folklore congress held at Centurion University, Paralakhemundi, Odisha in December 2014. Our Gratitude and thanks to Prof. Jawaharlal Handoo, President Indian Folklore congress.

CONTENTS:

Published by: 0

Working Papers

The output of the research by the faculty will be published in-house in the form of Working Paper and Research Study. Faculty will be encouraged to publish in referred journals. The output of student’s research will be published as dissertations, thesis or research reports. Each in-house publication will go through a quality assurance process before it is released in the public domain. The Research Coordination Committee may delegate the quality assurance task to the faculty members. If required, language editing facility will be provided to the faculty and the students. It is expected that each faculty will publish at least one Working Paper in a year.

Basic Sc and Humanities

GAP Report 2020

Civil Engineering

Computer Science and Engineering

Mechanical Engineering

Electronics and Communication Engineering

Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Management

Conference Papers

M.S.Swaminathan School of Agriculture

Published by: 0

Submission Procedure

All articles following the author guidelines and meeting the ethical standards can be sent to : [email protected] or send by post to:

The Chief Editor,

Centurion Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research

Centurion University of Technology and Management

Bhubaneswar, Odisha 752050

India

Published by: 0

Peer Review Process

All submissions to the journal are initially reviewed by the Editor and his Associates. At this stage manuscripts may be rejected without peer review if it is felt that they are not of high enough priority or not relevant to the journal. This fast rejection process means that authors are given a quick decision and do not need to wait for the review process. Manuscripts that are not instantly rejected are sent out for peer review, usually to two independent reviewers. Based on the feedback from these reviewers and the Editors’ judgment a decision is given on the manuscript within 30 to 45 days.

Editors’ responsibilities

All submissions must receive an answer from the Editor-in-Chief/Editor, either if the manuscript is rejected, considered for publication or accepted for publication. On a regular basis an article should be processed in less than 4 months from the date of submission by the author to the date of the communication of the editors’ final decision.

Only manuscripts that are considered for publication will be sent to blind peer review. Editor-in-Chief/Editor will choose appropriate reviewers considering the manuscript’s content. During the peer review process, editor or any editorial staff will not reveal to reviewers the identity of the authors.

Editors will expose information about a submitted manuscript only to the corresponding author, reviewers and other editorial advisers, except in the case of a manuscript that is suspected for double submission.

Editor may ignore any material that breaks legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Plagiarism is checked using standard software and any article with plagiarism above 20% is not acceptable.

Reviewers’ Responsibilities

All submitted papers are subject to strict double-blind peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are as follows:

  • Relevance: Is this paper relevant for the topics of this journal?
  • Soundness: Is this paper technically sound and complete?
  • Support: Are the claims supported by experimental/theoretical results?
  • Significance: Is the paper interesting for other researchers?
  • Originality: Are the results/ideas novel and previously unknown?
  • Readability: Is the paper well-organized and easy to understand?
  • Language: Is the paper written in correct English and style?

Of these, the main factors taken into account are significance and originality.

Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists Editor-in-Chief/Editor and the Editorial Board in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

CJMR reviewers perform work for the journal on a volunteer basis. Peer review assists Editor-in-Chief/Editor and the Editorial Board in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions but without re-review, revise and resubmit, or rejection. Articles that are often rejected include those that are poorly written or organized or are written in poor English. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed. Articles may be rejected without review if the Editor-in-Chief/Editor considers the article obviously not suitable for publication.

Promptness: If a reviewer feels that the received manuscript does not suite his/hers specialty field and the reviewing process will suffer, he needs to notify the editor.

All reviews should be delivered to the editorial staff in due time. On a regular basis, the review of an article should not take more than one month from the submission of the manuscript to the reviewer to the transmission of the completed review form to the CJMR editorial board.

The reviewing process needs to be objective, reviewers should argue their statements and personal criticism is not permitted.

The reviewers must use the review form delivered by the editors together with the submitted article. By consenting to do a review the reviewers accept that their names will be published in the list of former reviewers of the journal.

Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should attempt to identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that a result or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Published by: 0

General Guideline for Authors

Language of Contribution:  English.

Preferred Length of paper: 3500 – 5000 words.

The title page must include: Title: Concise and informative. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible

Author names and affiliations: Please indicate the given name and family name clearly. Present the authors’ affiliation addresses  if available, the e-mail address, and telephone number of each author properly

Corresponding author: Clearly indicate who is willing to handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. Ensure that telephone numbers (with country and area code) are provided in addition to the e-mail address and the complete postal address. 

Sponsoring information: If the research is sponsored or supported by an organization, please indicate it.

General Rules for Text formatting

Font: Times New Roman; Font Size: 12 (English)

Paragraph Spacing: Above paragraph – 0 pt; Below paragraph – 6 pt

Line Spacing: fixed – 12 pt (or double-spaced)

Page Margins & Size: One-inch margins on single-sided A4 or 8.5 x 11-inch paper

Heading 1: Times New Roman; Size-12; Non Italic & Bold; for example

Heading 2: Times New Roman; Size-12; Italic; for example, 1.1 Research Methods

Heading 3: Times New Roman; Size-12; Non Italic; for example, 1.1.1 Analysis Result

All manuscripts should be prepared in Microsoft Word format, in Times New Roman, font size 12 for English, typed in double space and one-inch margins on single-sided A4 paper. In case of quantitative/experimental work, the author(s) must specify the purpose of the study. The text of observational and experimental articles should usually be divided into the following sections with the headings, such as Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion to clarify their content. All pages of the manuscript should be numbered consecutively at the right corner of the page.

The Title page (page-1 must contain title of the article, name(s) of the corresponding author(s) telephone, and email address of the author responsible for correspondence. It must also contain the source(s) of support if any received in the form of grants, equipment, drugs. The word count should include text of the article only (excluding abstract, acknowledgements, figure legends, and references). This page should also indicate the number of figures used in the article. Page-2, must contain only title of the article, abstract and keywords. Page-3 onwards must contain the actual article beginning with the Title and ending with References.

Abstract: An abstract is a succinct (one paragraph) summary of the entire paper. A concise and factual abstract is required (maximum length of 250 words). The abstract should state briefly the aims, methods, results and major conclusion of the research. From the abstract, a reader should be able to make out the content of the article. Hence, it requires special attention of the author. An abstract is often presented as separate from the article, so it must be able to stand alone. References should be avoided.

Keywords: Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 8 keywords, avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, ‘and’, ‘of’).

Introduction: The main purpose of the introduction is to provide the necessary background or context of the study (i.e the nature of the problem and its significance). State the specific purpose or objective of the study. Provide a brief but appropriate historical backdrop and the contemporary context in which the proposed research question occupies the central stage.

Methods: Methods section must succinctly describe what was actually done. Describe the source population and the selection criteria for study participants. Identify the methods, apparatus, and procedures in sufficient detail to allow other workers to reproduce the results. Authors submitting review manuscripts should describe the methods used for locating, selecting, extracting and synthesizing data. Describe statistical methods with enough detail to enable a knowledgeable reader with access to the original data to verify the reported results.

Results: Authors must avoid repeating in the text, all the data provided in the tables or illustrations and graphs as an alternative to tables with many entries or duplicate data in graphs and tables. This section must focus on scientifically appropriate analyses of the salient data.

Discussion: This section must emphasize the new and important aspects of the study and the conclusions that follow from them. For experimental studies it is useful to begin the discussion by summarizing briefly the main findings, and then explore possible mechanisms or explanations for these findings. Compare and contrast the results with other relevant studies, state the limitations of the study, and explore the implications of the findings for future research and clinical practice. The Results and Discussion sections may be combined

References: References must be written according to the guidelines of Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition). Responsibility for the accuracy of bibliographic citations lies entirely with the authors.

  • Citations in the text: Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Avoid citation in the abstract. Unpublished results and personal communications should not be in the reference list, but may be mentioned in the text. Citation of a reference as ‘in press’ implies that the item has been accepted for publication.
  • Citing and listing of web references: As a minimum, the full URL should be given. Any further information, if known (author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.), should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.
  • Text: Citations in the text must follow the referencing style used by the American Psychological Association. You can refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (Sixth Edition).
  • List: References must be arranged first alphabetically and then further sorted chronologically if necessary. More than one reference from the same author(s) in the same year must be identified by the letters “a”, “b”, “c”, etc., placed after the year of publication.

Use the author/date system of reference in the text (e.g., Chomsky, 1997). Gather the references alphabetically after the text, using last names and first initials.

Original Articles: Original articles must report research work which has not been published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Reporting Standards: Authors should certify the originality of the work failing which they will remain responsible for same.

Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, which are not partially or totally published elsewhere, or submitted for publication elsewhere. If the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission in the case of using other images and artwork or for adaptations of such images, if they do not have copyright for them.

Plagiarism will be followed by the rejection of the manuscript. Authors have full responsibility for the authenticity of their paper. In case of multiple authors, the authenticity of the article needs to be ensured by all of them.

Any unethical behavior, manufacture of research results or promotion of deceitful or incorrect arguments may cause the rejection of a submission or the withdrawal of a published article.

Copyright: Published articles are under the copyright of the journal. Partially or totally publication of an article elsewhere is possible only after the consent from the editors.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or conference. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal or conference constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism above 20% is not acceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. The corresponding author must maintain the communication with all the co-authors.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Author Self-Archiving: The authors are not permitted to post published articles on their personal or institutional website. However, they should post the published article information with a clear indication of that the paper was published in the journal of Content, Community and Communication with a link to the journal’s website.

Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his or her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.



Published by: 0